Next Section

Previous Section

 
 ACTED.................1
nonetheless would in some way have  acted  as mandatary (agent) for the owner subject to a 588
 
 ACTES.................1
JAMBU-MERLIN, R., Essai sur la rétroactivité dans les  actes  juridiques () Vol. , 3840
 
 ACTING................1
C.C.Q. because he cannot claim to be  acting  in good faith. Moreover, where rights 304
 
 ACTION................1
refuses to perform, the other may institute an  action  in passation of title. Thus, a promise of 886
 
 ACTIONS...............1
agreements and legal relations arising from the  actions  of the parties to those agreements must 1620
 
 ACTIVITÉS.............1
de services au cours de lannée, dans le cours des  activités  dune entreprise, même si les 2384
 
 ACTS..................31
...  Acts  of administration 16
.  Acts  of alienation by onerous title performed by a person who is bound to make 282
whom restitution is owed.  Acts  of alienation by gratuitous title may not be set up, subject to the 284
Any other  acts  performed in favour of a third person in good faith may be set up against the 286
One should begin by noting that the  acts  of alienation contemplated in the first paragraph of 290
article include only  acts  that transfer ownership. All other acts, including grants of real 290
article include only acts that transfer ownership. All other  acts , including grants of real 290
contrary, all  acts  entered into by the creditor during the same period are retroactively validated, 322
 Acts  of administration pendente conditione, were considered under the old doctrine (i.e. 332
...  Acts  of administration 574
Under the old law,  acts  of administration that the possessor performed pendente conditione 576
The cases have long admitted that  acts  of administration, such as leases, performed by the 584
It follows that  acts  of administration performed by the debtor while he was in possession are not 598
Under our law, it seems to me that  acts  of administration done by the debtor while he had 602
As we discussed article of the new Civil Code states that any other  acts  performed in 606
owed. This article, if and when it applies, only codifies the former law on  acts  of administration. 608
Only true  acts  of administration will be discussed here, such as conclusion of a lease, and not 610
other  acts  possibly falling within article , paragraph , which some would say include 610
conditions retroactivity, anything that flows naturally and logically also escapes it, such as  acts  646
seen, he relied on other grounds for his submission that fruits and administrative  acts  are not 664
regarding fruits and administrative  acts . As for Mignault, his discussion only applies within the 678
apply retroactivity in certain very specific situations, such as the collection of fruits and  acts  of 684
Possession and enjoyment of the thing, collection of the fruits, and performance of  acts  of 688
the specific exceptions in the code regarding fruits, risks and  acts  of administration.698
purposes, a federal statute assigns certain effects to juridical  acts  or facts governed by the Civil 1384
ownership in the thing. Note that all the examples given by Mignault and Mazeaud refer to  acts  1602
unaffected. This includes but is not limited to any  acts  of administration performed by the 2080
cases provided for in the Civil Code, namely fruits and  acts  of administration. Under the new 2110
I.T.A., cancel the transactions or  acts  carried out by the parties to the contract between the 2746
 Acts , but the annulment of the original deed of sale would create an obligation for the 3208
retroactivity, such as the collection of fruits, the enjoyment of the property or  acts  of 3322
 
 ACTUAL................8
sale is not an  actual  sale: 886
by the delivery of the property to the promising buyer and that buyer has  actual  possession 900
precedes the  actual  signing date? The answer in common law jurisdictions is similar to the 1136
by operation of law. If, in the legal result, the  actual  transaction ceases to be one of sale, then 1300
UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION; EXCERPTS NOT TRANSLATED IN  ACTUAL  1586
buyer until the  actual  sale, which was to take place once a specific portion of the purchase price 1614
If, in the legal result, the  actual  transaction ceases to be one of sale, then the necessary support 1884
where there has been a de jure sale, the  actual  disposition only occurs at the moment the 2092
 
 ACTUALLY..............10
ineffaceable facts, that  actually  happened pendente conditione. We will return to this 558
possession, that were  actually  performed and that produced results, cannot be defeated by the 604
ineffaceable that is to say, tangible, irreversible events that have  actually  occurred. 688
complete payment has been made, on the other. Such a clause is  actually  an instalment sale, 760
vendor, in delivering the property, and the promisor-buyer, in taking possession, have  actually  904
contract to the date of that writing. The situation is different if the parties  actually  intended that 924
courts and lawyers  actually  apply the common law concept of beneficial ownership, or should 1232
The Exchequer Court  actually  established the test for disposition in MNR v. Wardean 1460
retroactivity does not apply to risks does not  actually  stem from the principle invoked.2112
transferred to the buyer after the deed is  actually  signed. In Kozan v. MRN for example, the 2222
 
 AD....................1
cancelled using the nemo plus juris  ad  alium transferre potest quam ipse habet rule, 628
 
 ADAM..................1
(para. .()), Alepin (para. .()) and  Adam  (para. .()). In these cases, the courts 2016
 
 ADDITION..............26
In  addition , article C.C.Q., which specifically provides that a condition fulfilled has a 310
the buyer is considered never to have been the owner. In  addition , the fulfilment of the condition 442
obligation no longer has an object. In  addition , the buyers obligation to pay the price no longer 492
In  addition , as pointed out earlier, Faribault himself relied on other reasons for his position 676
In  addition , a clause that provides for the resolution of the contract if the debtor fails to perform 742
In  addition , the rights that make up ownership can be split between a legal owner and a 992
the parties had clearly intended the sale to take effect on January , . In  addition , the seller 1432
 addition , Wardean Drilling purchased ancillary equipment from another supplier. That contract 1466
interpretation of the term disposition in  addition  to the test established in Wardean Drilling. 1558
was lost. In  addition , the lessee assumed all charges and expenses associated with the leased 1678
In  addition , subsection () of the Act, in my view, provides a legislative basis for the 1770
law. In  addition , it is significant that Parliament, which annually amends the Act inter alia to 1784
civil law; the oposite situation is seen more frequently. In  addition , the Minister in this instance 1814
contingent liabilities necessarily have a retroactive effect. In  addition , this retroactivity applies 1944
large sums were payable to the Respondent as a result of this transaction. In  addition , the 2012
benefit. In  addition , the retroactive nature of a resolutory condition in civil law was not an 2024
In  addition , we are unable to consider that a disposition is an incontestable fact. We believe 2118
In  addition , the Bulletin does not mention the retroactive effect of a fulfilled suspensive 2668
In  addition , with respect to conditions precedent, we have seen that at common law, beneficial 2776
In  addition , one can clearly infer from the response that if the suspensive condition is not fulfilled, 2792
In  addition , it implied that there had been a transfer of possession to the buyer pendente 2856
In  addition , even if the Wardean Drilling test was applied in a civil law content, the disposition 3324
common law precedent into civil law. In  addition , the case was based on the division of 3352
from the CCA be reimbursed? In  addition , can the buyer, who retroactively own the property 3480
 addition , see J.-L. BAUDOUIN and P.-G. JOBIN, supra note , No. at -; L. 4050
 addition , see L. FARIBAULT, supra note,No at . 4058
 
 ADDITIONAL............9
However, Faribault articulates an  additional  argument, also advanced by Baudry-Lacantinerie, 548
born, except, of course if the law makes its creation dependent on some  additional  act, such as 922
which was payable to it. Any  additional  rights to which it was entitled under the agreement were 1648
the sale price was to include a certain sum payable immediately plus  additional  sums calculated 1908
from the date of the sale, would be payable on these  additional  sums. 1910
 additional  sums indicated in the contract, did not exist until extracted from the financial 1912
accumulate. The Minister, for his part, argued that the  additional  amounts, once determined, 1916
Writing for the Court, Le Dain J. began by explaining that the obligation to pay the  additional  1918
This technical interpretation seems to impose  additional  conditions on, rather than increasing, the 3010
 
 ADDITIONALLY..........1
 Additionally , this review of the cases also indicates that the rule of acquisition stated by 1718
 
 ADDITIONNAL...........1
The Minister claimed the  additionnal  amount was not interest as there was no principal at the 2264

Next Section

Top of Section