Next Section

Previous Section

 
 AIMED.................1
view. The question Whose business is it? was  aimed  at the person providing the 248
 
 AIR...................1
Regina v. Walker, wears an  air  of deceptive simplicity, which tends to wear thin on 1578
 
 AL....................2
Natrel Inc. v. Tribunal du travail et  al ., R.J.D.T. (S.C.). 1834
Côté et  al .v. Rheault, Q.B. , Food Drivers, Commission Salesman, Dairy 2112
 
 ALAIN.................4
statements by author  Alain  J. Gaucher bear reiterating: 332
determining a workers status, as author  Alain  J. Gaucher points out: 388
 Alain  J. GAUCHER, A workers status as employee or independent contractor : its 1890
For a more comprehensive analyse, see the paper by  Alain  J. Gaucher entitled A 2030
 
 ALEXANDER.............3
 Alexander  v. MRN, C.T.C. (C.E.). 1792
 Alexander  v. MNR, D.T.C. , (Exchequer Court). 1950
 Alexander  v. MNR, supra, note , where the status of a pathologist had to be determined.2324
 
 ALEXANDRE.............2
 Alexandre  BUSWELL, La transformation de lemploi : implications juridiques et perspectives 1882
See also the article by  Alexandre  Buswell, La transformation de l'emploi : implications 2270
 
 ALLEGED...............3
degree of the detailed control over the person  alleged  to be the servant as said McCordie, J. 1182
personal service contract), then for the purposes of the Income Tax Act his  alleged  plan of 1240
Was the  alleged  servant part of his employer's organization? Was his work subject to co-1966
 
 ALLOW.................5
Act  allow  scientific research and experimental development expenses to be deducted in 944
contract of employment, the employer has an obligation to  allow  the performance of the work 1016
 allow  the small business deduction because it deemed Marcel Lapointe to be carrying on a 1190
only vague clues as to the nature of service and does not  allow  us to determine on simple 1498
to see that Parliament chose to  allow  a small number of deductions from employment income 1696
 
 ALLOWABILITY..........1
The  allowability  of deductions gives rise to many disputes. When the courts are called upon to 1692
 
 ALLOWABLE.............4
... COMPUTATION OF INCOME AND  ALLOWABLE  EXPENSES 24
 ALLOWABLE  EXPENSES 820
type of income. In the case of employment income, the ITA gives a list of  allowable  deductions 1686
dispute over  allowable  deductions based on the income the taxpayer generated. It is interesting 1694
 
 ALLOWANCE.............1
(ii) the cost to the corporation of any benefit or  allowance  provided to an 892
 
 ALLOWED...............2
income from a personal services business. No deduction is  allowed  for expenses other than:888
The distinction is equally important in labour law, mainly because only workers are  allowed  to 994
 
 ALLOWS................9
The ITA  allows  employees to deduct specific expenses from their income, provided they meet 820
The ITA  allows  an active business carried on by a corporation, provided it is a private, 900
Section . ITA  allows  taxpayers, other than professionals, who operate a business to 934
Section ITA  allows  an insurance agent or broker to deduct an amount equal to the amount 958
Finally, subsection () ITA  allows  a taxpayer who carries on a business or practises a 960
against them. In this case, the legislator  allows  the principal or the employer to avoid that 976
doing creates a relationship between them. It is primarily the subordination test that  allows  us to 1628
Parliament probably  allows  more deductions to a person who owns a business and takes a 1698
The test that  allows  us to make that determination must be broad and factual. It is important to 1740
 
 ALTER.................1
test, which had found that such changes in compensation did not  alter  the taxpayers autonomy 326
 
 ALTERED...............1
changes brought about by Quebecs reforms  altered  the situation regarding the coexistence of 70
 
 AMBIGUOUS.............4
in an  ambiguous  situation where there seem to be some elements that favour a determination of 368
Because those definitions are unsatisfactory in  ambiguous  cases, the principles of private law 1272
CCQ, the fact remains that some decisions appear to be  ambiguous  in terms of the application 1358
the rules of private law have to be used in  ambiguous  cases. 1406
 
 AMENDED...............1
related to provincial private law, changed, as rules of civil law were abolished,  amended , 72
 
 AMENDMENT.............2
This  amendment  reaffirms the rule stated above by making it mandatory and, more importantly, 1150
status must be determined. We believe that this  amendment  will mean better application of the 1152
 
 AMERICAN..............3
Canadian, British and  American  authorities. Emphasis was placed on the tests established in 194
In a recent case, Madam Justice Lucie Lamarre was asked to determine whether an  American  1256
Commission des Normes du Travail v. North  American  Automobile Association Ltd., 1822
 
 AMOUNTS...............9
duration of task, autonomy, magnitude of  amounts  involved, method of payment, ownership of 124
employees premium, subject to a certain limit. The total of these  amounts  must then be 856
worker has insurable employment, because the payer will have to pay considerable  amounts  if it 858
Another section of the ITA also limits the  amounts  that can be deducted in computing 888
incurred by it in collecting  amounts  owing to it on account of services rendered.900
Finally, even if the business is a personal services business, the  amounts  payable under the 906
Finally, the Court ruled that only the  amounts  paid by the taxpayers employer should be 1254
considered insurable  amounts  under the Act. 1254
employment income are far more limited than the  amounts  that can be deducted from business 1688
 
 ANALYSE...............11
 Analyse  the concepts of employee and self-employed worker. How much of a distinction is 8
Where there are differences between the principles applicable in tax law and the principles of the Civil Code of Québec,  analyse  the impact and tax implications of the situation. Evaluate the practical side of the issue by referring to the legislation, such as the Income Tax Act, the Employment Insurance Act, the Excise Tax Act and the Canada Pension Plan.40
 Analyse  the concepts of employee and self-employed worker. How much of a 52
 analyse  the current state of both tax law and civil law on this point and then targets problems 76
The Court went on to  analyse  chance of profit and risk of loss and applied the integration test 306
should  analyse  the way the courts apply those concepts, particularly when the source of the 1130
payers business, must be used to  analyse  the overall relationship. The Federal Court of Appeal 1224
It would be useful to look at where the CCLC used to be and then  analyse  the situation today. 1278
principles of the Civil Code of Québec,  analyse  the impact and tax implications of the 1384
For a more comprehensive  analyse , see the paper by Alain J. Gaucher entitled A 2030
 analyse  the other tests. In that case, the decision in Wiebe Door Services Ltd. v. MNR, supra, 2408
 
 ANALYSED..............6
It should be noted, however, that when the Court applied the integration test, it  analysed  it from 314
Integration must be  analysed  from the workers point of view, not the payers. Integration 454
reiterated that every factor has to be  analysed  and that in some situations no test may be 1338
and risk of loss or chance of profit. The other tests were not otherwise  analysed . The decision 1594
majority, stated the phrase in the course of performing his duties can be  analysed  in the light 1990
Personal performance is  analysed  in terms of whether the work is done by someone else. 2190
 
 ANALYSES..............1
The economic reality test  analyses  the business structure required by anyone claming to be a 138
 
 ANALYSING.............2
 analysing  the overall situation. Many tests are taken into consideration in that analysis. The 786
TRANSLATION The nature of contractual relationships can be determined only by  analysing  1300
 
 ANALYSIS..............25
.  ANALYSIS  OF THE IMPACT AND TAX IMPLICATIONS OF THIS SITUATION 42
encountered in applying the established principles. The aim of this  analysis  is to shed light on the 78
Courts  analysis  in Montreal v. Montreal Locomotive Works Ltd. that the control test is a 232
While this test is well known, it might be useful at the outset to emphasize that in his  analysis  of 292
confirmed it is not critical to the  analysis , the Federal Court of Appeal cases since Wiebe Door 336
subordinate to an  analysis  of all the facts surrounding the relationship. This approach of 344
this decision a little later in our  analysis . 362
However, the type of questionnaire provided by CCRA does not seem to reflect the  analysis  474
analysing the overall situation. Many tests are taken into consideration in that  analysis . The 786
department suggests a two-step  analysis : first, actual subordination, and second, the other tests. 786
 Analysis  of the terms used in the different legislative instruments shows that lawmakers do not 1092
business, the Tax Court of Canada undertook a comprehensive  analysis  of the distinction 1192
taxpayer. The judge did a brief  analysis  of the specified result, risk of loss and ownership of 1268
The decision in Beiss contains a very detailed  analysis  of the various tests developed in 1288
.  ANALYSIS  OF THE IMPACT AND TAX IMPLICATIONS OF THIS 1448
The issue underlying this  analysis  is whether the ITA readily lends itself to making a distinction 1464
The answer is no, and this lengthy  analysis  bears witness to that finding. It must be concluded 1466
service. As we stated in the course of this  analysis , self-employed workers are service 1494
As shown by the preceding  analysis , no test is perfect, and as author J.E. Magee points 1542
as any other Canadian, it seems appropriate to take the  analysis  a step farther and consider 1572
We believe, based on our  analysis , that the subordination test is appropriate in matters of civil 1636
self-employed. Finally, the preceding  analysis  shows that the civil-law tests and the various 1638
We stated in the first part of the  analysis  that one of the main differences between an employee 1684
Marc Noël, Contract for services, contract of services A tax perspective and  analysis , 1970
For a comprehensive  analysis , see John W. Durnford, Employee or Independent 2412

Next Section

Top of Section