The Concordance

Next Section

 
 AAA...................1
In Dionne v. Ligue de développement du hockey midget  AAA  du Québec inc., J.E. 1022
 
 ABANDON...............1
individual to  abandon  his residence within the meaning of the C.C.Q. than to become a non-606
 
 ABANDONED.............3
 abandoned  a domicile, in a country for example, when he ceases to reside there and no longer 270
that he has voluntarily established his domicile elsewhere and  abandoned  his previous domicile. 478
demonstrated, there must also be evidence that the previous domicile has been  abandoned , 654
 
 ABANDONMENT...........1
 abandonment  of the previous residence. 656
 
 ABODE.................6
particular place of  abode  or even a shelter. He may sleep in the open. It is important 100
permanently in Canada or to have an habitual  abode  here. He never really settled in 212
place of  abode  by setting up his matrimonial home and family there, he is permitted to 372
he shall be deemed to be a resident of the Contracting State in which he has an habitual  abode ;954
(c) if he has an habitual  abode  in both States or in neither State, he shall be deemed to be a 954
outside the jurisdiction. Even permanency of  abode  is not essential since a person may be a 1092
 
 ABROAD................11
tax purposes while  abroad , including: 228
e) the permanence and purpose of stay  abroad . 232
less than two years, he was presumed to have retained his residence status while  abroad , unless 236
employment as a missionary  abroad , following a course of study abroad as a student, 332
employment as a missionary abroad, following a course of study  abroad  as a student, 332
accepting temporary employment  abroad , accompanying a spouse who has accepted 334
temporary employment  abroad ? 334
return to Canada at the end of a stay  abroad  as a factor in determining whether a taxpayer 576
of a taxpayers stay  abroad . The two-year test found in Interpretation Bulletin IT-R 596
e) The taxpayers permanence of stay  abroad . 642
stay  abroad . 644
 
 ABSENCE...............14
In the  absence  of a statutory definition, the jurisprudence has developed guiding principles 70
significant ties to Canada which would have made him a resident despite his physical  absence .240
for domicile, an individual may remain domiciled in a place despite a prolonged  absence  if there 276
) is the physical  absence  caused by a clearly temporary situation such as 332
In my view to allow physical  absence  to be treated as residence within the country 338
have stated on many occasions, too long of an  absence  from Canada, albeit a 348
similar interpretation. In my view to allow physical  absence  to be treated as residence 356
in cases where physical  absence  is encountered during a statutory period, proof of 368
continued residence will require evidence as to the temporary nature of the  absence , a 368
person to retain his domicile despite a more or less prolonged  absence , as long as it is unclear 476
maintained his residence during his  absence . Section of IMP.-R states the following:576
Translation In the  absence  of definitions, courts have defined the notion of residence 630
defined in laws using this factor to connect a person to a jurisdiction. The  absence  of a 674
even though the  absence  may be more or less lengthy. It is also enhanced if he returns there 994
 
 ABSENCES..............3
 absences  which occurred immediately before the application for citizenship?324
) what is the extent of the physical  absences if an applicant is only a few days 328
short of the ,-day total it is easier to find deemed residence that if those  absences  330
 
 ABSENT................3
federal tax authorities assumed that, where a Canadian resident was  absent  from Canada for 234
other hand, where an individual was  absent  from Canada for two years or longer, he was 238
residence, even where a taxpayer has been physically  absent  from the country for an extended 362
 
 ABSOLUTELY............1
but the importance of similar facts may differ  absolutely  in different cases The 264
 
 ABSTRACT..............1
According to Deleury and Goubau, the notion of residence is less  abstract  and more realistic 402
 
 ACCEPTED..............1
accepting temporary employment abroad, accompanying a spouse who has  accepted  334
 
 ACCEPTING.............1
 accepting  temporary employment abroad, accompanying a spouse who has accepted 334
 
 ACCESSORIES...........1
maintains or centralizes his ordinary mode of living with its  accessories  and social relations, 888
 
 ACCOMMODATE...........1
 accommodate  the differences in legislative policy, while keeping as a foundation the same notion 686
 
 ACCOMPANIED...........1
 accompanied  by a sense of transitoriness and of return. (Emphasis added) 106
 
 ACCOMPANYING..........1
accepting temporary employment abroad,  accompanying  a spouse who has accepted 334
 
 ACCORDINGLY...........5
 Accordingly , if it is held that an individuals ties to Canada are sufficient to make him a resident, 158
 Accordingly , if a person owns several houses in different jurisdictions, his place of domicile will 266
interpreted by the tax case law inspired by the common law.  Accordingly , there is a 690
 Accordingly , where a federal law does not define a private law term, we must turn to the private 722
interpretation.  Accordingly , the federal Interpretation Act contains the following provision:756
 
 ACCOUNT...............6
Finally, taking into  account  the diversity of definitions of residence and domicile, but especially 50
taxpayer was only in Canada for one hour should not be taken into  account . 176
and his stockbroker were all in the United States. Apart from one bank  account  and 202
into  account  for establishing whether or not a person was resident in Canada within 346
We may also take into  account  the taxpayers intentions and the reasons which have led to his 644
version takes into  account  the common law and the civil law was tabled on May , 716
 
 ACCOUNTS..............2
holding credit cards and bank  accounts  in Canada; 134
married, but still, all his family was in the United States. His bank  accounts  and savings 200
 
 ACCUMULATED...........3
 accumulated  at least three years of residence in Canada calculated in the following 292
 accumulated  one-half of a day of residence, and 296
 accumulated  one day of residence. 298
 
 ACHIEVE...............1
adaptable interpretation based on the goal that a particular statute is intended to  achieve .682
 
 ACKNOWLEDGES..........1
The author  acknowledges  with thanks the assistance of Julie Gaudreault-Martel (student-872
 
 ACQUIRE...............2
wishing to  acquire  Canadian citizenship, not only that he possess certain civic and moral 310
On the other hand, it is quite possible for a person to involuntarily  acquire  a new residence 478
 
 ACQUIRED..............2
until it is proven that a new domicile has been  acquired . A person is deemed to have 268
resident though travelling continuously and in such a case the status may be  acquired  by a 1092
 
 ACQUISITION...........2
may reside in several places for tax purposes. Furthermore, the  acquisition  of a domicile 650
requires a degree of fixity greater than that required for the  acquisition  of residence for tax 650
 
 ACTED.................1
country. In fact, the way he  acted  shows rather that it was never his intention to stay 212
 
 ACTION................3
his  action  and statements may be adduced. It is impossible to formulate any general rule 260
A Quebec litigant involved in an  action  pertaining to his civil rights under a federal enactment 748
In Droit de la famille - , R.J.Q. , the Superior Court held, in an  action  1034
 
 ACTIVITIES............2
respect of, but only in respect of,  activities  of the person carried on through that 524
be a non-resident person in respect of, but only in respect of,  activities  of the person 530
 
 ACTREGARDING..........1
on section . of the Taxation  Actregarding  the notion of residence under that statute. 30
 
 ACTS..................1
Province of Quebec and to amend certain  Acts  in order to ensure that each language 716
 
 ACTUAL................2
()  actual  presence in Canada remains the most relevant and crucial factor to be taken 344
effected by  actual  residence in another place coupled with the intention of the person to make it 452
 
 ACTUALLY..............1
 actually  lived in Canada for an appreciable time. Parliament wishes by this means to ensure that 312
 
 ADAPTABLE.............1
 adaptable  interpretation based on the goal that a particular statute is intended to achieve.682
 
 ADAPTING..............1
with a view to  adapting  each legislative text to a specific goal. The specific presumptions found 684
 
 ADDERSON..............4
refers to the  Adderson  v. Adderson case, which held that: 424
refers to the Adderson v.  Adderson  case, which held that: 424
 Adderson  v. Adderson (), D.L.R. (th ) (Alta. CA). 1030
Adderson v.  Adderson  (), D.L.R. (th ) (Alta. CA). 1030
 
 ADDITION..............6
factor. But in  addition  to physical presence is the issue of whether the person has centralized his 364
C.C.Q.). Furthermore, the  addition  of the notion of ordinarily to that of residence has 434
even incorporates the provisions of the E.T.A. by reference. In  addition , in a way similar to that 556
 addition , the Quebec case law on residence for tax purposes has been developed in conjunction 564
In  addition , in the Roy case, Crête J. of the Court of Appeal of Québec used the criteria 628
Id., par. . In that case, the Court held that, in  addition  to not having met the three-year 1002

Next Section

Top of Section