The Concordance

Next Section

 
 ABANDONED...........................1
The no change in beneficial ownership requirement may be  abandoned  without the fisc 1414
 
 ABILITY.............................3
exercisable on death. In such circumstances, the settlors  ability  to dispose of the property 300
settlor is general in nature, the settlors  ability  to choose the person to whom the property is 436
 ability  to dictate the ultimate disposition of the trust property is unlimited. This position is not 1350
 
 ABSENCE.............................6
in the  absence  of default beneficiaries where the settlor retained a specific power of appointment 300
To compensate for this  absence  of any analytical framework, and to lend meaning to the 348
and that such phrase was a term of art. He added that in the  absence  of earlier authority, a 680
overcome the  absence  of the beneficial ownership concept in Québec civil law. Consequently, 1098
In the opinion of the majority of the Court, the difficulty created by the  absence  in the C.C.Q. of 1142
or capital in respect of certain property. The  absence  of such qualifying language in 1766
 
 ABSENT..............................6
be illustrated below,  absent  harmonization measures, the tax consequences of this transaction 96
law the beneficiary of a trust does not enjoy real rights in the trust property,  absent  the deeming 360
of the ITA is such that  absent  a specific deeming provision, property held by a corporation or a 700
acting as agent or nominee or the trust is a bare trust. Furthermore,  absent  sham or fraud, in 702
demonstrates that,  absent  sham or fraud, the scheme of the ITA is such that intermediary entities 710
the context of a qualifying disposition under subsections .().  Absent  the no change in 1524
 
 ABSOLUTE............................39
... Contingent or  Absolute  Rights Under the Trust 16
or future and whether  absolute  or contingent, to receive any of the income or capital of one of 64
future, whether  absolute  or contingent or whether conditional on or subject to the exercise of 244
The rights of the default beneficiaries are not  absolute ; rather, their rights are contingent or 392
type of right, i.e., immediate or future,  absolute  or contingent, dependent on the exercise of 400
someone elses discretion, or it may refer only to rights  absolute  and exercisable at the time 402
right as a beneficiary, whether immediate or in the future, whether  absolute  or contingent, and 412
 absolute  or contingent right, determined with reference to subsection (.), as a beneficiary 522
beneficiaries have any contingent or  absolute  right as a beneficiary under a trust determined with 524
having contingent or  absolute  rights as a beneficiary under a trust. 528
the creation of  absolute  or contingent rights of a person other than the settlor. In fact, this issue 530
than the settlor have an  absolute  or contingent right as a beneficiary, determined with reference 546
... Contingent or  Absolute  Rights Under the Trust 552
transfer no person other than the settlor has an  absolute  or contingent right as a beneficiary 554
ownership. What does an  absolute  or contingent right as a beneficiary mean? Does a default 560
version of paragraph ()(e) deems any person with an  absolute  or contingent right in a 776
whether  absolute  or contingent) to receive all or part of the income or capital in respect of 1068
No person (other than the individual) or partnership has any contingent or  absolute  right as a 1294
immediately after the transfer no  absolute  or contingent right of a person (other than the 1298
retained by the settlor for exercise in his or her will did not give rise to  absolute  or contingent 1330
preservation and perhaps enhancement of the no  absolute  or contingent right test, and an 1358
appointment and  absolute  or contingent right as a beneficiary. 1362
considered to have contingent or  absolute  rights as they are within subparagraph (.)). On 1400
 absolute  or contingent right requirement as reflected in paragraph ()(a), with appropriate 1532
 absolute  or contingent or whether conditional on or subject to the exercise of any discretion by 1540
circumstances where no  absolute  or contingent rights are created other than rights of the nominal 1546
 absolute  or contingent right concept. As suggested with respect to the definition of disposition 1566
whether  absolute  or contingent or whether conditional on or subject to the discretion of any 1568
in beneficial ownership of the property and no person (other than the taxpayer) has any  absolute  1580
intended substantive effect could be achieved by utilizing the expansive notion of the no  absolute  1588
partnership has any right (whether immediate or in the future, whether  absolute  or conditional or 1594
whether  absolute  or contingent, or whether conditional on or subject to the exercise of any 1632
objective may be achieved by using the no  absolute  or contingent right concept with an 1656
 absolute  or contingent interest in the property, save and except for possession of nominal or 1694
immediate or in the future, whether  absolute  or contingent or whether conditional on or subject 1764
 absolute  right as a beneficiary to be a beneficial owner of trust property for income tax 1768
expansive  absolute  or contingent language. 1772
right (whether immediate or future, whether  absolute  or contingent, or whether conditional on or 1782
arrangements and institutions are deemed to be trusts and a person with an  absolute  or 1806
 
 ABSOLUTELY..........................1
marginal rates. The beneficial ownership concept is not  absolutely  necessary to ensure that the 1468
 
 ABSORBS.............................1
G. FORTIN, How the Province of Québec  Absorbs  the Concept of the Trust, 1776
 
 ABUSE...............................4
couched in terms of  abuse , as follows: 1008
countries, there is an  abuse  of the convention, and Switzerland may adopt anti-abuse measures 1010
suggested amendment would not, as a practical matter, give rise to  abuse . 1520
Finally, the same potential  abuse  identified above with respect to the removal of the no change 1522
 
 ABUSIVE.............................1
curtails the perceived  abusive  structure described above. Essentially, if X did not have a capital 1408
 
 ACB.................................3
base ( ACB ) and () its cost amount less certain prescribed deductions. Assume the cost 1426
X settles a self-benefit trust with land. The land has an  ACB  of M. X dies years later at 1438
determine the capital gain realized on this deemed disposition. Assuming the  ACB  of the capital 1444
 
 ACCEPTABLE..........................1
results may be  acceptable  subject to the discussion of this solution, infra. However, given that, 1200
 
 ACCEPTED............................2
Even if it is  accepted  that the purpose and effect of subsection () is to provide taxpayers in 1084
In Olympia, which was subject to the laws of the Province of Québec, the Court  accepted  the 1170
 
 ACCESS..............................1
all Canadians will have  access  to federal legislation that is respectful of the legal tradition existing 82
 
 ACCESSING...........................1
the Court against the efficacy of an arrangement which saw a non-treaty country party  accessing  982
 
 ACCOMMODATE.........................1
and is likely inappropriate. In particular, those concepts cannot  accommodate  the common 160
 
 ACCOMPANY...........................1
 accompany  the amendments to the definition of cost amount. 1462
 
 ACCOMPANYING........................1
exercisable under a will. In particular, the Technical Notes  accompanying  the Technical 1304
 
 ACCORDANCE..........................6
revenues, and the payment of capital where the provision or payment is in  accordance  with the 498
no deemed disposition thereof in  accordance  with subsection () and neither the increase in 1402
of the capital interest to the settlor was nil in  accordance  with paragraph (.)(b). The cost 1428
amount of the capital interest in the trust to the settlor is determined in  accordance  with the 1428
disposed of in  accordance  with the subsection () definition of disposition. According to 1548
make explicit reference to that subparagraph and paragraph (as amended in  accordance  with 1600
 
 ACCORDINGLY.........................11
tax standpoint, the objective and,  accordingly , the challenge of harmonization is to concurrently 86
ownership.  Accordingly , a change in any of these rights and obligations would suggest a 284
disposed of is not tempered.  Accordingly , if the English version governs, the results are 438
property and,  accordingly , consistency is achieved using the French version. However, as will 450
not have any right to enjoy the benefits from the property, and  accordingly  is not the beneficial 594
A and B wish to proceed with a split-up butterfly transaction.  Accordingly , they transfer their 820
D.  Accordingly , each of Aco and Bco would be connected with Opco. Query, though, 838
who has or had,  accordingly  as the context requires, such ownership as a right in relation to that 1150
and may evolve over time.  Accordingly , a definition specific to Québec may not provide 1250
pursuant to a specific power of appointment.  Accordingly , it is the condition in subparagraph 1338
disposition in subsection (). It would  accordingly  be possible to remove the reference to 1534
 
 ACCOUNT.............................4
immediately placed in a segregated trust  account  and all distributions of these dividends were 194
made from that same  account . The respondent retained some such certificates for itself. When 194
paid to a bare trust, agent or nominee must not be taken into  account  for the purposes of the 950
settlors capital interest that takes into  account  the beneficiarys proportionate share of the value 1434

Next Section

Top of Section