Next Section

Previous Section

 
 APPLICATION.........................29
 application  in Québec of certain provisions of the ITA somewhat problematic. The concept of 46
trusts (deemed trusts) for purposes of the  application  of the ITA in relation to the Province of 62
treatment and  application  of the ITA throughout Canada, regardless of the unique features of 72
promote horizontal equity throughout Canada in the  application  of the provisions of the ITA and 86
difficulties can arise in applying provisions of the ITA that rely on the  application  of the concept 90
will be examined in both the common and civil law contexts as will the  application  of these 102
arising from the  application  of those provisions in the province of Québec and the common law 104
 application  of the ITA throughout Canada in these contexts. 106
v. Trans-Canada Investment Corp. Ltd. as illustrative of the  application  of that 182
interested in a trust for the purpose of lending some certainty to the  application  of the provisions 252
The potential  application  of subparagraph ()(f)(iii) to a given factual situation necessarily 378
 application  of that characterization to the ITA. 386
be discussed below, the  application  of the French version of subsection () could, in 452
However the statute does not restrict the  application  of the provision to such a case. In my 648
In my opinion, in considering the  application  of subsection () to the unusual facts of this case, 656
from the  application  of certain provisions of the ITA in the province of Québec are discussed 726
beneficial owner of the trust assets. Admittedly, the  application  of this analytical framework is 732
Québec is the  application  of the concept of change in beneficial ownership. While there is a 786
 application  of Québec private law to the question of whether the property belongs to the trust 884
However, in the authors view, the proper  application  of the decision is to restrict it to situations 1026
In its  application  in relation to the Province of Québec, a reference in this Act to any property 1144
The  application  of Québec civil law to the facts analyzed in the Olympia and Wardean Drilling 1188
To promote uniformity of  application  of the provisions of the ITA, the use of concepts or terms 1278
(.) limits the  application  of section by imposing certain additional conditions in order to 1290
alternative language could be employed if there is any doubt as to its  application  in that context.1556
equity throughout Canada in the  application  of the ITA and preserve the tax policy objectives 1670
receive inconsistent  application  as between Québec and the common law provinces. The 1672
contributes to the potential inconsistent  application  of the provisions of the ITA in which 1678
 application  of this subsection could result in a person being deemed to be a beneficial owner of 1680
 
 APPLIED.............................10
strives to ensure that federal legislation is consistently  applied  throughout Canada with full 84
owner is  applied  in the ITA. The first context relates to the identification of the person who is 100
when the French versions of subsection () and paragraph ()(f) are  applied  to a 446
the no change in beneficial ownership concept would be  applied  harmoniously throughout 518
the provision is being  applied  was taken in the Construction Bérou case, discussed infra. The 892
.()(b)(ii) was being  applied  in relation to a common law province, consistent treatment is a 944
Ltd v. The Queen illustrate the issues that may arise when private law concepts are  applied  1112
circumstances in which section or subsection .()  applied . The Technical Notes 1578
section or subsection .()  applied  and no person (other than the individual) or 1592
law is interpreted and  applied  uniformly throughout Canada. 1698
 
 APPLIES.............................9
Although the ITA is meant to overlay the private law of the jurisdiction in which it  applies , it 238
paragraph ()(f)  applies . 442
 applies , the discretionary beneficiaries would be within its ambit, would be deemed 506
sets out that, in circumstances where paragraph ()(a.)  applies , the cost amount of the 1430
(a) If the contributor is a trust, other than a trust to which paragraph (j)  applies , the 1496
property is transferred in circumstances to which subsection ()  applies  1498
(a) Except where paragraph (b)  applies , where a trust ... disposes of one or more 1504
rollover provisions  applies , the taxpayer will be deemed to have disposed of the property for 1560
 applies  only for purposes of subdivision k. 1714
 
 APPLY...............................6
would only  apply  to the settlor of the trust and there would be no change in the beneficial 432
does not  apply  to deem the discretionary beneficiaries to be beneficial owners of the trust 542
()(f) does not  apply  to the trustee because it only deems a person having a right as a 868
A Court would likely not strictly  apply  private law principles of ownership in determining 886
intended to ensure that these provisions will not  apply  where legal title has been transferred to 1046
A similar solution would appear to  apply  in respect of insurer foreclosures subs. 1870
 
 APPLYING............................10
difficulties can arise in  applying  provisions of the ITA that rely on the application of the concept 90
Paragraph ()(f) provides that in  applying  the provisions of the ITA in relation to the 110
superficial manner, certain problems inherent in  applying  the ITAin Québec, this, as will be 364
encountered in  applying  specific provisions of the ITA with respect to property held in trust in 550
that arises is whether there is a basis for adopting a similar approach to interpreting or  applying  696
Support for  applying  a limited meaning of the concept of beneficial ownership outside of the 704
problems that could be encountered when  applying  the provisions of the ITA in which the 716
analysis is intended to highlight some of the issues that can arise when  applying  certain 718
might be based on common law principles. The conflicting objectives of  applying  legal 1214
deemed disposition of capital property took place at : p.m. on Wednesday.  Applying  the 1450
 
 APPOINT.............................12
In Québec, the common law distinction between a power to  appoint  and a discretionary trust 482
does not exist. Article of the C.C.Q. contemplates the reservation of a power to  appoint  484
beneficiaries. Although the power to  appoint  terminology is used, if the article were referring 484
beneficiary. It is submitted that despite the power to  appoint  terminology, article , in 488
of property to a trust where the power to  appoint  beneficiaries under the trust is reserved by the 1306
the settlor retains a general power to  appoint  in his or her will was to allow for subsection () 1328
general power of appointment, meaning that the appointor must have the power to  appoint  to 1346
 appoint  the beneficiaries or determine their shares, or confer it on the trustees or a third person. 1368
In the case of a personal or private trust, the power to  appoint  may be exercised by the 1370
trustee or the third person only if the class of persons from which he may  appoint  the beneficiary 1370
appointment as one that allows the holder of the power to  appoint  to the decedent, his estate, 1378
Under a general power of appointment, the donee may  appoint  anyone in the 1752
 
 APPOINTED...........................1
interest, e.g., Has the trust been settled? Has a trustee been  appointed ? Has the beneficiarys 176
 
 APPOINTEE...........................5
to a true power of appointment, in the common law sense, the term  appointee  would be a more 486
amendment to paragraph (.)(a) to include only the right of an  appointee  pursuant to a 1360
Brown, the potential  appointee  is not afforded any rights at the time the property is made 1550
 appointee  under a mere power enjoys no right to the property that is the subject of the power. 1552
the potential future right of an  appointee  under a specific power of appointment. Of course, 1556
 
 APPOINTEES..........................12
... Potential  Appointees Discretionary Beneficiaries 16
owners (i.e., beneficial owners) of the trust property, whereas potential  appointees  may not be 210
property. While potential  appointees  do not enjoy such an interest, the default beneficiaries 288
... Potential  Appointees Discretionary Beneficiaries 454
Instead of potential  appointees , assume the trust has discretionary beneficiaries. In describing 492
examine whether potential  appointees  under a power of appointment or discretionary 524
From a common law perspective, potential  appointees  are not beneficiaries under a trust; they 526
are merely potential  appointees  under a power. As such, it is incorrect to speak of them as 528
subparagraph (.)(b)(ii) for persons who may be potential  appointees  under a power of 1342
treatment on the transfer X meets the necessary criteria ( appointees  under a will are not 1398
However, one should bear in mind that these potential  appointees  do have the right to 1552
Under a special i.e., specific power of appointment, the choice of  appointees  is 1748

Next Section

Top of Section