Next Section

Previous Section

 
 R.....................5
In the first place, it is The Quebec Act,  R .S.C., , Appendix II, No. that 38
Constitution Act, , Item )  R .S.C., , Appendix II, No. . () 46
Common Law ()  R .G.D. at . 742
Green v. Russell QB , at , All E. R . (CA); Tobin Tractor 770
Personal Property, rd Edition (Toronto, ON:  R .M. Willes Chitty) ; Sands v. Standard Ins. 864
 
 RADICALLY.............1
 radically  different but taken together express the whole of the legislative norm.98
 
 RAISES................1
common law terminology. This  raises  the issue of marking harmonization changes to indicate 398
 
 RAISONS...............1
Ajouter ici brièvement les autres  raisons  citées dans la lettre de la ministre 902
 
 RAYNER................7
A.H. Oosterhoff W.B.  Rayner , Anger and Honsberger Law of Real Property, Vol. , 742
Bastarache Boudreau Ouellet, supra note , at ; Oosterhoff  Rayner , supra note 752
Bastarache Boudreau Ouellet, supra note , at ; Oosterhoff  Rayner , supra note 754
Oosterhoff  Rayner , supra note , at . 760
Oosterhoff  Rayner , supra note , at . 760
Oosterhoff  Rayner , supra note , at . 762
Oosterhoff  Rayner , supra note , at . 764
 
 RC....................1
http:canada.justice.gc.caendept rc index.html. 978
 
 RD....................2
Bruce Ziff, Principles of Property Law,  rd  ed. (Scarborough, ON: Carswell, ), .750
Personal Property,  rd  Edition (Toronto, ON: R.M. Willes Chitty) ; Sands v. Standard Ins. 864
 
 READERS...............1
drafters, policy makers, tax administrators and all  readers  of bijural tax enactments. These rules 662
 
 READILY...............2
It can  readily  be seen from these remarks that three types of problems are of concern in the 344
preferable to use more neutral terms and concepts that apply  readily  to both legal traditions or, 388
 
 READS.................2
law with respect to property rights. The section  reads  as follows: 482
drafting techniques designed to reflect Canadian bijuralism in federal legislation. It  reads  554
 
 REAFFIRMED............1
maintains. The latter distinction was  reaffirmed  in Canson Enterprises Ltd. v. 182
 
 REALITY...............3
Plainly, the former  reality , in which the English text represents the common law and the French 102
text represents the Civil Code, not only ignored the  reality  of a vibrant civil law culture in English 104
Myth or  Reality ?, in The Harmonization of Federal Legislation with the Civil Law of the 684
 
 REASONS...............3
lexicon in federal legislation was not desirable for several  reasons . The legislature has 406
legislation. All these  reasons  led the Department of Justice, after consulting various experts, to 478
equity  reasons . 648
 
 RECEIVES..............1
to that effect. The property in such cases passes to the heir or the legatee who  receives  the 788
 
 RECENTLY..............3
Canadian provinces. This interpretive approach was  recently  approved by the Supreme Court 568
have been completed and others are in progress. The first reports, most of which have  recently  604
Four other reports were  recently  completed and are published hereafter in this Journal. 612
 
 RECOGNITION...........3
one argued for the  recognition  of the complementary nature of provincial private law in matters 502
and opened the door to the  recognition  of bijuralism with respect to federal legislation.504
A new debate ensued from this  recognition : does provincial private law complete only federal 504
 
 RECOGNIZE.............2
Section . of the Interpretation Act has two inseparable objectives: to  recognize  Canadian 480
 recognize  diversity should not, however, inhibit the need for coherence and the need to reduce 986
 
 RECOGNIZED............4
, which  recognized  that in matters of property and civil rights (private law), the civil law 16
formally  recognized  in any statutory provision. The same is true of the principle of 474
Both the common law and the civil law are equally authoritative and  recognized  sources of the 484
be denied that the lessees interest was closely attached to the land and the courts  recognized  822
 
 RECOGNIZES............3
formally  recognizes  that it is imperative that the four Canadian legal audiences (Francophone 70
is owned by the Crown who grants rights and interests: it  recognizes  no absolute ownership of 216
land and instead  recognizes  estates or interests in land (theory of the bundle of rights). 216
 
 RECOGNIZING...........1
What is the significance of  recognizing  the duality of our legal traditions in federal legislation? 58
 
 RECONCILE.............2
legal traditions. Aside from the need to  reconcile  linguistic differences that may exist between 62
the French and English versions of legislation, there is a further requirement to  reconcile  the 62
 
 RECONSIDERED..........1
This interpretative approach must now be  reconsidered  following the adoption of the principle 648
 
 RECORDS...............7
alternative, it was decided to create bijural terminology  records , an administrative tool to 414
Affairs, the Department of Justice made these bijural terminology  records  available. 418
These bijural  records  briefly explain the harmonization problems found in the legislative 418
Amendments Act, and describe the solutions adopted. These  records  identify civil 420
law and common law terminology in both official languages. The bijural terminology  records  422
of the bijural terminology  records  has already been demonstrated by the Supreme Court of 424
Canada in the Schreiber case. The Court relied on these  records  to confirm that the 424
 
 REDRAFTING............2
provinces. The  redrafting  of certain federal enactments being one of the harmonization tools 562
chosen, section . was added so that the  redrafting  process does not give rise to any ambiguity 562
 
 REDUCE................1
recognize diversity should not, however, inhibit the need for coherence and the need to  reduce  986
 
 REDUCED...............1
was charged with second-degree murder and pleaded guilty to a  reduced  charge of 510
 
 REFER.................5
 refer  either expressly or by implication to the civil law for its implementation.52
federal definitions or specific federal rules are provided, they often  refer , in varying degrees, to 152
civil law when they  refer  to provincial private law rules and concepts. This revision is similar in 324
interpreting an enactment it is necessary to  refer  to a provinces rules, principles or concepts 486
The expression common law provinces is used to  refer  to all Canadian provinces except 674
 
 REFERENCE.............6
self-contained. Others, however, can only be fully understood and comprehended if  reference  126
executor: before these amendments,  reference  was made solely to the concept of 442
joint ownership: adjustments were made to certain provisions in which  reference  was made 450
forming part of the law of property and civil rights,  reference  must be made to the rules, 486
that once it is public law any  reference  to a private law concept must be interpreted in light of 540
case) or relies upon provincial private law to complete it, then  reference  is to be made to 550
 
 REFERENCES............2
and rules for the civil law environment. Other examples of unijuralisms include  references  to 350
and concepts the legislator avoids, in whole or in part,  references  to and potential differences in 378
 
 REFERRING.............2
correct terminology is used when  referring  to them. Professor Nicholas Kasirer, while 82
or immovables will have to read the provision as  referring  to the concept of hypothec or 566
 
 REFERS................6
Most of Canadas private law is provincial. Therefore, where federal legislation  refers  to 132
neutral term co-ownership copropriété was used which  refers  to all forms of co-ownership 454
I do not think there can be any doubt that this part of the Act, which  refers  to succession 538
no avoiding the fact that a federal statute, albeit one characterized as public law, that  refers  to a 544
In keeping with this decision, one will first need to determine if the federal legislation  refers  to a 546
Noakes v. Rice, AC , , L.J. Ch. , . Lord Halsbury  refers  to Lord 858
 
 REFLECT...............3
terminology that is used in federal legislation must be updated to  reflect  the reform of the Civil 360
drafting techniques designed to  reflect  Canadian bijuralism in federal legislation. It reads 554
legislation which relies upon complementary provincial law  reflect  Canadas bijural and bilingual 584
 
 REFLECTION............1
common law interpretation as a better  reflection  of Parliaments intent. 338
 
 REFLECTS..............1
wording that accurately  reflects  the vocabulary, concepts, norms and institutions of Quebecs 342
 
 REFORM................4
known between and the  reform  of the Civil Code in , was the subject of many 262
result of the  reform  of the Civil Code of Québec in . The Civil Code underwent a major 358
terminology that is used in federal legislation must be updated to reflect the  reform  of the Civil 360
executor. Since the  reform  of the Civil Code, this term is obsolete, having been replaced with 442
 
 REGARD................4
French civil law as it existed prior to with its subsequent alterations in Quebec in  regard  to 40
same time with its subsequent alterations in Quebec and in Canada in  regard  to anything 42
with  regard  to the goal pursued. 564
having  regard  exclusively to common law concepts and terminology and that their interpretation 632

Next Section

Top of Section