Next Section

Previous Section

 
 BANKRUPTCY............1
()  Bankruptcy  and Insolvency, () Marriage and Divorce. 700
 
 BAR...................1
the common law. I have a hard time imagining how, in the case at  bar , Mr. Morin's succession 542
 
 BARBARA...............1
 Barbara  Pierre, Classification of Property and Conceptions of Ownership in Civil and 740
 
 BARE..................1
concepts such as leasehold interest, joint ownership and  bare  trust. 352
 
 BARRON................2
John Augustus  Barron  and Arthur Henry OBrien, Barron and OBrien on Chattel 862
John Augustus Barron and Arthur Henry OBrien,  Barron  and OBrien on Chattel 862
 
 BASED.................1
international community.  Based  on a study undertaken in by the Law Faculty of the 114
 
 BASES.................1
the common law and the civil law as varying  bases  of suppletive law for federal legislation that 100
 
 BASIC.................1
The  basic  difference between the civil law hypothec and the common law mortgage relates 302
 
 BASTARACHE............9
The Honourable Mr. Justice Michel  Bastarache , Supreme Court of Canada, Bijuralism in 676
Michel  Bastarache  Andréa Boudreau Ouellet, Précis du droit des biens réels, e Éd., 750
 Bastarache  Boudreau Ouellet, supra note , at ; Oosterhoff Rayner, supra note 752
 Bastarache  Boudreau Ouellet, supra note , at ; Oosterhoff Rayner, supra note 754
considered to be under absolute ownership;  Bastarache  Boudreau Ouellet, supra note , at 758
 Bastarache  Boudreau Ouellet, supra note , at . 762
 Bastarache  Boudreau Ouellet, supra note , at -. 826
For a discussion on the origins of the Torrens system, see  Bastarache  Boudreau Ouellet, 856
The Honourable Mr. Justice Michel  Bastarache , Supreme Court of Canada, stated the 978
 
 BEARMAN...............1
Co., Gr. ; Martin v.  Bearman , U.C.Q.B. , at . Centre de traduction et de 866
 
 BEAULNE...............3
See Jacques  Beaulne , Droit des fiducies, (Montréal: Wilson Lafleur, ), at , footnote 794
 Beaulne , supra note , at -. France Allard, The Supreme Court of Canada and its 796
Allard, supra note , at ;  Beaulne , supra note , at -. 802
 
 BECOMES...............2
court can change a written rule, if a rule  becomes  the source of injustice, the only solution 170
in common law. The trustee never  becomes  the owner of the property at law and although the 270
 
 BELONGS...............2
 belongs  to public law as opposed to private law, such concept or rule should have the same 34
 belongs  to and is best analysed in the context of the law of contract and not the law of 294
 
 BENEFICIAL............6
people to hold concurrently a common law title and an equitable title ( beneficial  ownership) for 224
title to the property while the beneficiary or  beneficial  owner, holds the equitable title to the 252
Duality of title between the legal and  beneficial  owner is thus an important difference between 274
use of the concept of  beneficial  ownership and of other trust law concepts in tax legislation. 348
ownership or  beneficial  ownership in the development of tax policy is problematic. It is 388
ITA with Quebec civil law. Professor Catherine Brown analyzes the concept of  beneficial  616
 
 BENEFICIARIES.........1
over which he has the control for the benefit of persons (the  beneficiaries ), of whom he may 250
 
 BENEFICIARY...........9
three parties: the settlor, the  beneficiary  and the trustee. The following definition of the concept 246
title to the property while the  beneficiary  or beneficial owner, holds the equitable title to the 252
moral duty owed to the  beneficiary . It is so strong as to allow tracing of the property in the 254
hands of a third party in certain circumstances: the  beneficiary  is allowed to trace the trust 256
property into its product. The  beneficiary  has a similar right against anyone to whom the trustee 256
property anymore, neither the trustee nor the  beneficiary . There is no duality of property as 270
property. Thereafter, the trustee only has duties and obligations and the  beneficiary  has 272
trustee or  beneficiary  and in which none of them has any real right. 808
Article CCQ: While the trust is in effect, the  beneficiary  has the right to require, 816
 
 BENEFIT...............2
over which he has the control for the  benefit  of persons (the beneficiaries), of whom he may 250
according to the constituting act, either the provision of a  benefit  granted to him or the payment 818
 
 BENEFITS..............5
legislation which depends so much on an equal distribution of tax burdens and  benefits ). 110
certain rights to require  benefits  or payments. 274
obligations and tax  benefits  to all Canadians, regardless of the legal system that governs them.330
the  benefits  provided in the PSSA. 516
equitable distribution of tax burdens and tax  benefits  in light of a taxpayers ability to pay and 624
 
 BIENS.................1
Michel Bastarache Andréa Boudreau Ouellet, Précis du droit des  biens  réels, e Éd., 750
 
 BIJUR.................1
http:canada.justice.gc.caennewssp bijur .html) 874
 
 BIJURAL...............14
Having acknowledged the need for bilingual and  bijural  tax legislation, let us examine the 122
emergence of new terminology in  bijural  provisions might present a problem for the Anglophone 396
Every one agreed, however, that the new techniques of  bijural  legislation needed to be 412
alternative, it was decided to create  bijural  terminology records, an administrative tool to 414
Affairs, the Department of Justice made these  bijural  terminology records available. 418
These  bijural  records briefly explain the harmonization problems found in the legislative 418
law and common law terminology in both official languages. The  bijural  terminology records 422
of the  bijural  terminology records has already been demonstrated by the Supreme Court of 424
rights. What is more, there are no rules of interpretation to guide those required to apply  bijural  476
legislation which relies upon complementary provincial law reflect Canadas  bijural  and bilingual 584
Given that the purpose of the Harmonization Act is to highlight  bijural  terminology used 590
however, is the formulation or the expression of the federal tax rules in a  bijural  environment. 626
drafters, policy makers, tax administrators and all readers of  bijural  tax enactments. These rules 662
goal, what would be the purpose of our federal system and  bijural  culture? The need to 984
 
 BIJURALISM............47
Canadian  Bijuralism  and Harmonization of Federal Tax Legislation 0
. Canadian Duality:  Bijuralism  8
 Bijuralism , in the Canadian context, is the coexistence of two major contemporary legal 8
traditions: common law and civil law ( bijuralism ). Tax legislation like all other federal 12
under the Royal Proclamation, . Canadian  bijuralism  dates back to the Quebec Act, 14
The distinction between private law matters and public law matters is critical as  bijuralism  only 26
Legislative  Bijuralism , which: 70
being fine-tuned with full respect being paid to bilingualism and  bijuralism . ()86
Viewed from a drafting perspective, Canadian  bijuralism  appears to impose a tremendous 108
worlds two major legal systems,  bijuralism  places Canada in a privileged position within the 112
legal systems, civil law systems accounting for . alone. Canadian  bijuralism  thus offers at 116
Indeed  bijuralism  viewed from an international perspective expands considerably our legal 118
definition: in a  bijuralism  context, the definition drafting technique consists in giving a 374
Harmonization and  bijuralism  should not only inform the drafting of tax legislation but they 384
for the interpretation of federal legislation in light of Canadian  bijuralism .472
Although the existence of Canadian  Bijuralism  stems from the Quebec Act of , it is not 474
 bijuralism  and to consecrate the principle of the complementarity of federal law and provincial 482
property and civil rights in Canada, a premise of Canadian  bijuralism . In addition, the provision 490
and opened the door to the recognition of  bijuralism  with respect to federal legislation.504
drafting techniques designed to reflect Canadian  bijuralism  in federal legislation. It reads 554
A number of research projects on various issues pertaining to Canadian  bijuralism  in the tax field 604
of the Tax Law Team of the  Bijuralism  and Drafting Support Services Group for their invaluable 668
The Honourable Mr. Justice Michel Bastarache, Supreme Court of Canada,  Bijuralism  in 676
of Quebec and Canadian  Bijuralism . Second Publication, Booklet , (Ottawa: Department 678
of Justice Canada, ), ; Louise Maguire Wellington,  Bijuralism  in Canada: 678
with the Civil Law of the Province of Quebec and Canadian  Bijuralism . Second 680
Europe The Cohabitation of Bilingualism and  Bijuralism  in Federal Legislation in Canada: 684
Province of Quebec and Canadian  Bijuralism . Second Publication, Booklet , (Ottawa: 686
Department of Justice Canada, ), -. See also Policy on Legislative  Bijuralism , in The 686
Canadian  Bijuralism . Second Publication, Booklet , (Ottawa: Department of Justice 688
Policy on Legislative  Bijuralism , supra note , at . 702
the Civil Law of the Province of Quebec and Canadian  Bijuralism . Second Publication, 704
Legal Experts Harmonization of Federal Law with Quebec Civil Law: Canadian  Bijuralism  708
the Province of Quebec and Canadian  Bijuralism . Second Publication, Booklet , 710
of the Province of Quebec and Canadian  Bijuralism . Second Publication, Booklet , 720
Justice and Deputy Attorney General of Canada, Evolution of Legal Systems,  Bijuralism  and 722
with the Civil Law of the Province of Quebec and Canadian  Bijuralism . Second 724
Civil Law and Canadian  Bijuralism . Collection of Studies, (Ottawa: Department of Justice 732
Canadian  Bijuralism . Second Publication,Booklet , (Ottawa: Department of Justice 736
Impact on the Expression of  Bijuralism , in The Harmonization of Federal Legislation with 796
the Civil Law of the Province of Quebec and Canadian  Bijuralism . Second 798
Canadian  Bijuralism , Montreal (Quebec), November . (available on the web at 874
 Bijuralism . Second Publication, Booklet , (Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada, ), 940
 Bijuralism . Second Publication, Booklet , (Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada, ), 944
Law and Canadian  Bijuralism : A Collection of Studies in Tax Law (Montreal, QC: APFF, 970
Canadian  bijuralism  to assist the Department in its harmonization work deriving from the 972
this program is also to promote the development of expertise in Canadian  bijuralism  among law 974

Next Section

Top of Section