Next Section

Previous Section

 
 BIJURALISM.........11
much as possible, their work must constantly be respectful of this Canadian  bijuralism . A 68
principle of Canadian  bijuralism . This is evident, for example, with respect to the legal notion of 70
Canadian  bijuralism  as the notion of interest is foreign to the Quebec civil law tradition. 76
Moreover, it should not be forgotten that to respect Canadian  bijuralism  is to take into 76
language that is as precise as possible while respecting Canadian  bijuralism , despite the fact 350
that respecting  bijuralism  in its purest form may admittedly result in drafting that may seem 352
objective of Canadas legislative  bijuralism  is to make it possible for each version of a statute 568
However, we conceive that the nature of Canadian  bijuralism  is such that it is difficult to 674
suggested the use of the technique of the double in order to respect the principle of  bijuralism . 688
Canadian legal audiences and the Canadian legal system based on  bijuralism  will be respected. 864
our approach is not necessarily the most appropriate in respecting Canadian  bijuralism  in its 870
 
 BIJURIDISME........4
Canada, Rapport du comité sur le  bijuridisme  législatif, published on April , by the 908
avec le droit civil québécois et le  bijuridisme  canadien, Congrès , Montréal, Association de 920
fiscales fédérales avec le droit civil québécois et le  bijuridisme  canadien, Congrès , 1044
Canada, Rapport du comité sur le  bijuridisme  législatif, published on April , by 1084
 
 BILINGUAL..........1
 bilingual  or bijural drafting. In fact, that is precisely one of the concerns of the terminology 362
 
 BILINGUES..........2
CRÉPEAU, P.-A., Dictionnaire de droit privé et lexiques  bilingues , nd ed., Cowansville, 916
P.-A. Crépeau, Dictionnaire de droit privé et lexiques  bilingues , nd ed., Cowansville, 1048
 
 BINDS..............1
collaboration. This text reflects the personal opinion of the author and  binds  only him.996
 
 BLAIS..............6
Cowansville, Yvon  Blais , . 906
Yvon  Blais , . 918
LAMONTAGNE, D.-C., Biens et propriété, nd ed., Cowansville, Éditions Yvon  Blais  inc., 926
Cowansville, Yvon  Blais , , defines a licence in the following terms: a licence is in the 1030
Éditions Yvon  Blais  inc., . 1048
Yvon  Blais , . 1050
 
 BLESSED............1
Canada not  blessed  to have the benefit of these two systems? Why shouldn't we take advantage 896
 
 BOOK...............2
vol. , nd ed., Aurora, Canada Law  Book , . 932
nd ed., Aurora, Canada Law  Book , , p. . 1014
 
 BORNE..............1
It should be  borne  in mind that Canadian law of real property, i.e. the law that is relevant to the 168
 
 BOUDREAU...........1
The author would like to thank Andréa  Boudreau  Ouellet and Gérard Snow for their precious 994
 
 BRANCH.............2
Legislative Services  Branch  of the Federal Department of Justice. 908
the Legislative Services  Branch  of the Federal Department of Justice. 1086
 
 BRIAN..............1
An example of a writer who takes this position is  Brian  D. SEGAL, Dispositions of 1094
 
 BRINGS.............2
which  brings  us to the conclusion that any attempt to properly standardize the application of the 678
This  brings  us to the idea that the approach which consists in not restricting the term 756
 
 BRITISH............1
term interest(intérêt) within the Canadian context, is rather similar to  British  law as it existed 168
 
 BRITISHCOMMON......1
used under  Britishcommon  law, to harmonize it with the civil law legal system and, finally, to 82
 
 BROADER............3
.. Licence An example in which the term droit has a  broader  scope than the term 22
Technically, a right in or to property which is less than ownership or title. In a  broader  228
 BROADER  SCOPE THAN THE TERM INTEREST 326
 
 BROADEST...........1
civil law the right of ownership is considered as the right with the  broadest  possible scope 414
 
 BUILDINGS..........1
From a purely technical point of view, land, houses,  buildings , ranches, farms, and the products 216
 
 BUNDLE.............4
property, an interest(intérêt) denotes that  bundle  of rights that a person may assert over a 108
and sometimes that the owner of an interest has a  bundle  of rights: 298
Moreover, inasmuch as the property right consists of a  bundle  of rights, the owner of an interest 298
If we start from the premise that an interest(intérêt) is a  bundle  of rights that a person may 556
 
 BURKE..............2
 BURKE , J., Jowitts Dictionary of English Law, nd ed., London, Sweet Maxwell, .914
J.  Burke , Jowitts Dictionary of English Law, nd ed., (London : Sweet Maxwell, 1006
 
 BUSINESS...........5
... Interest in a  business  14
... INTEREST IN A  BUSINESS  258
When reference is made to interest in a  business , it is not a reference to interest(intérêt)in a 260
technical sense. In fact, the courts have held that an interest in a  business  would possibly be a 260
Court of Appeal correctly stated that: The validity of contracts and  business  transactions is 998
 
 BÉNÉFICES..........2
droit réel Sont réputés des droits réels les baux sur des biens immeubles, les  bénéfices  dune 836
droit réel Sont réputés des droits réels les baux sur des biens immeubles, les  bénéfices  dune 878
 
 BÉROU..............6
 Bérou , Desjardins, J.A.,writing for the majority, stated: 798
Construction  Bérou . It is interesting to note that the three judges of the Federal Court of 818
property and, by applying Construction  Bérou , the outcome would be similar to the majority 826
R. v. Construction  Bérou  Inc. D.T.C. . 946
(FCA); Larivière v. Canada, F.C. (FCA); R. v. Construction  Bérou  Inc. 1040
Similar problems to R. v. Construction  Bérou  Inc. C.T.C. (FCA). 1098
 
 BÉROUX.............1
R. v.  Béroux , C.T.C. (C.F.A). 946
 
 CANADA.............28
From the outset, it should be noted that income tax is a statutory creature. In  Canada , the 58
 Canada  is a bijural state characterized by the co-existence of a civil law system and a dozen 66
notion of interest that are reflective of  Canada s four legal audiences in order to respect 92
 Canada s bijural traditions in the spirit of fiscal equity in the application of the ITA and the ETA, 92
not the duty of the legislative drafter to merge  Canada s two legal systems.354
Revenue  Canada  refused to allow a capital loss relating to the property at the time of death of 544
objective of  Canada s legislative bijuralism is to make it possible for each version of a statute 568
taxpayer resident in  Canada  will be treated equally for tax purposes regardless of his or her 672
regardless of where they reside in  Canada  and at the same time make the law more predictable 704
Canderel Ltée v.  Canada  that the law of income tax is sufficiently complicated without 720
interpretation could have fairly disastrous consequences for the  Canada  Customs and Revenue 732
The federal Parliament accordingly devised, for tax purposes and for all of  Canada , a 798
ITA (which has been in force since ) could have been applicable to all of  Canada  although 850
 Canada  not blessed to have the benefit of these two systems? Why shouldn't we take advantage 896
 Canada , Rapport du comité sur le bijuridisme législatif, published on April , by the 908
vol. , nd ed., Aurora,  Canada  Law Book, . 932
Residents of  Canada  () vol. , no Canadian Tax Journal. 938
Banque Royale du  Canada  v. Sparrow Electric Corp., S.C.R. . 940
Canderel Ltée v.  Canada , S.C.R. . 940
Larivière v.  Canada , F.C. (C.A.F.). 942
St-Hilaire v.  Canada  (Procureur général) F.C. (F.C.A.) 948
nd ed., Aurora,  Canada  Law Book, , p. . 1014
See in this regard St-Hilaire v.  Canada  (Attorney General) F.C.J. No. (QL) 1040
(FCA); Larivière v.  Canada , F.C. (FCA); R. v. Construction Bérou Inc. 1040
 Canada , Rapport du comité sur le bijuridisme législatif, published on April , by 1084
See also Royal Bank of  Canada  v. Sparrow Electric Corp., S.C.R. for a 1092
Interest in and Options on Real Property and Shares by Non-Residents of  Canada  () vol. 1096
See R. v. Lagueux Frère Inc., D.T.C. ; Larivière v.  Canada , F.C. 1100
 
 CANADA'S...........1
of that? We are convinced that it would be, no pun intended, in  Canada's  interest to do so898
 
 CANADIAN...........35
ITA must apply within the context of the private law of each  Canadian  province or territory. 60
two legal systems upon which  Canadian  private law is founded. The same goes for the Excise 64
much as possible, their work must constantly be respectful of this  Canadian  bijuralism. A 68
principle of  Canadian  bijuralism. This is evident, for example, with respect to the legal notion of 70
 Canadian  bijuralism as the notion of interest is foreign to the Quebec civil law tradition. 76
Moreover, it should not be forgotten that to respect  Canadian  bijuralism is to take into 76
 Canadian  province and territory. In short, our purpose is to harmonize the terminology relating 88
i.e. each  Canadian  taxpayer must be taxed in the same manner regardless of where he or she 94
It should be borne in mind that  Canadian  law of real property, i.e. the law that is relevant to the 168
term interest(intérêt) within the  Canadian  context, is rather similar to British law as it existed 168
language that is as precise as possible while respecting  Canadian  bijuralism, despite the fact 350
order to ensure uniform application of these two statutes to all  Canadian  taxpayers, regardless 670
However, we conceive that the nature of  Canadian  bijuralism is such that it is difficult to 674
ITA and ETA to all  Canadian  taxpayers must be preceded by an analysis of some of the legal 678
withthe term interest(intérêt) so that  Canadian  taxpayers may be taxed in the same manner 702
tax legislation to all  Canadian  residents regardless of where they reside. In furtherance of that 780
treatment of the components of these notions in order to properly standardize  Canadian  tax 784
concept referring to the right of ownership to ensure the fair and equal treatment of all  Canadian  808
 Canadian  taxpayers in addition to clarifying the state of the law. 828
interest for the four  Canadian  legal audiences , we quickly realized that it was ironic that the 848
 Canadian  legal audiences and the Canadian legal system based on bijuralism will be respected. 864
Canadian legal audiences and the  Canadian  legal system based on bijuralism will be respected. 864
our approach is not necessarily the most appropriate in respecting  Canadian  bijuralism in its 870
law, it is our opinion that this solution is consistent with the  Canadian  constitution, respects the 872
legal terminology of the four  Canadian  legal audiences and the essence of the two legal 872
successoral Canadian  Common Law Dictionary: Law of Property and Estates, 904
()  Canadian  Tax Foundation :. 910
BEAUREGARD, P.-J., Interaction du droit civil et de la Loi de limpôt ()  Canadian  Tax 912
DUKELOW, DAPHNE, and NUSE, Betsy, The Dictionary of  Canadian  Law, nd ed. 922
Residents of Canada () vol. , no  Canadian  Tax Journal. 938
Dukelow, Daphne, and Betsy, Nuse, The Dictionary of  Canadian  Law, nd ed. Carswell, 1008
successoral Canadian  Common Law Dictionary: Law of Property and Estates, 1030
P.-J. Beauregard, Interaction du droit civil et de la Loi de limpôt ()  Canadian  Tax 1070
P. Barsalou, Limpact du droit civil dans lapplication des lois fiscales, ()  Canadian  1082
, No.  Canadian  Tax Journal -. 1096

Next Section

Top of Section